Radiation Oncology Research in Asia: Current Status and a Peep Into the Future From the Federation of Asian Organizations for Radiation Oncology.

PURPOSE: This survey was conducted to assess the current research practices among the 14 members of the Federation of Asian Organizations for Radiation Oncology (FARO) committee, to inform measures for research capacity building in these nations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 19-item electronic survey was sent to two research committee members from the 14 representative national radiation oncology organizations (N = 28) that are a part of FARO. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 14 member organizations (93%) and 20 of 28 members (71.5%) responded to the questionnaire. Only 50% of the members stated that an active research environment existed in their country. Retrospective audits (80%) and observational studies (75%) were the most common type of research conducted in these centers. Lack of time (80%), lack of funding (75%), and limited training in research methodology (40%) were cited as the most common hindrances in conducting research. To promote research initiatives in the collaborative setting, 95% of the members agreed to the creation of site-specific groups, with head and neck (45%) and gynecological cancers (25%) being the most preferred disease sites. Projects focused on advanced external beam radiotherapy implementation (40%), and cost-effectiveness studies (35%) were cited as some of the potential areas for future collaboration. On the basis of the survey results, after result discussion and the FARO officers meeting, an action plan for the research committee has been created. CONCLUSION: The results from the survey and the initial policy structure may allow facilitation of radiation oncology research in the collaborative setting. Centralization of research activities, funding support, and research-directed training are underway to help foster a successful research environment in the FARO region.

Oral health related quality of life of oral cancer patients treated with radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy in a tertiary referral centre in Sri Lanka.

BACKGROUND: Oral cancer is the number one cancer among males in Sri Lanka. Radiotherapy is a common treatment modality for oral cancer, but this can affect oral health related quality of life (OHRQOL). This study assessed the OHRQOL and its changes from baseline to the last week of radiotherapy and three months post radiotherapy among oral cancer patients who received this treatment alone or with chemotherapy. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted among 90 oral cancer patients awaiting for radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy. The modified Sinhala version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Oral Health Module (EORTC QLQ-OH15) was used to gather data related to OHRQOL before radiotherapy. Socio-demographic and clinical data were also recorded. The same cohort of patients were followed up and assessed their OHRQOL during the last week of radiotherapy and three months post radiotherapy. The Modified EORTC QLQ-OH15 assesses the OHRQOL under three domains namely 'Eating problem', 'Gum and speech problem' and 'Soreness', and one item named as 'Teeth'. RESULTS: The majority of the sample (88%) was males. The anterior two-thirds of the tongue (40%) and buccal mucosa (22%) were the most common sites. The median scores of 'Eating problem' domain at baseline, last week of radiotherapy and three months post radiotherapy were 20 (IQR = 6.7-33.3), 100 (IQR = 86.9-100.0) and 66.7 (IQR = 46.7-93.3) respectively. 'Gum and speech problem' was higher during last week of radiotherapy (median, 50.0, IQR, 25.0-58.3) than three months post radiotherapy (median, 8.3, IQR, 0.0-33.3). The changes of OHRQOL between the time frames were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Baseline OHRQOL in relation to 'Gum and speech problem' domain and 'Teeth' item was identified as an influential factor for OHRQOL during last week of radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The OHRQOL of oral cancer patients who received radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy had deteriorated from the baseline level to the last week of radiotherapy but then improved at three months post radiotherapy. The OHRQOL however did not return to the baseline level three months post radiotherapy. OHRQOL during the last week of radiotherapy was influenced by the OHRQOL at baseline, civil status and sites of metastasis.

Translation and validation of Sinhala version of modified EORTC QLQ-OH15 in oral cancer patients who receive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in Sri Lanka.

BACKGROUND: The recognition of patient-reported outcomes for oral cancer is important in improving patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the modified Sinhala version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Oral Health Module (EORTC QLQ-OH15). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to validate the EORTC QLQ-OH15 that was modified after adding two questions to the original questionnaire. The two questions added were 'difficulty in opening the mouth wide' and 'trouble with talking' which affect oral health related quality of life (OHRQOL) of oral cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. The Sinhala translated modified EORTC QLQ-OH15 and already validated the core questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 were self-completed by 85 adult oral cancer patients who received initial anti-cancer treatment with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Content and face validity were examined by an expert panel. Construct validity was confirmed by using factor analysis, multi-trait scaling analysis, and known group comparison. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency, test-retest reliability by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and intra class correlation coefficient. Responsiveness to change was assessed. RESULTS: The majority of participants (58%) were aged 50-69 years and 84% were males. Nearly 32% had cancer of the anterior two thirds of the tongue. Of the sample, 66% received chemo radiotherapy. Thirteen items were included for the factor analysis. They were loaded for four factors. Three scales 'Eating problem', 'Gum and Speech problem' and 'Soreness' loaded with 5, 4 and 3 items respectively and single item 'teeth' to a one factor with the total variance explained was 72.74%. Mann-Whitney U tests for all three scales were statistically significant confirming the ability of the modified EORTC QLQ-OH15 to detect expected differences in OHRQOL in clinically different groups. Cronbach's alpha for all the scales were more than 0.8. Wilcoxon Matched Paired Sign Rank Test showed highly significant results (p < 0.05) for all three scales revealing high responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Sinhala version of the EORTC QLQ-OH15 is a valid, reliable tool that can be used to measure OHRQOL in oral cancer patients who receive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Trends in disease indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the Asia-Pacific region: A report of the Activity Survey 2017 from APBMT.

The Asia-Pacific Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (APBMT) has been conducting annual surveys on the activity of hematopoietic stem cell transplants since 2007. The APBMT Data Center collected the following data in 2017. A total of 21,504 transplants were registered from 733 transplant centers of 20 countries/regions in the Asia-Pacific (AP) region. Five countries/regions comprised 89.4% of all transplants - China (6,979), Japan (5,794), South Korea (2,626), India (2,034), and Australia (1,789). The number of centers in these five countries/regions also comprised 88.9% of all centers: Japan (373), China (123), India (66), Australia (45), and South Korea (44). The overall ratio between autologous and allogeneic transplants was 37.0% and 63.0%, respectively, but the ratios varied significantly among countries/regions. Autologous transplants have surpassed allogeneic transplants in Thailand, Australia, Vietnam, New Zealand, Singapore, and Iran. In contrast, the proportion of allogeneic transplants comprised over 70% of all transplants in Pakistan, China, and Hong Kong. These ratios were compared by the Data Center among countries/regions that performed more than 50 transplants. The proportion of related and unrelated transplants also differed among countries/regions. The number of unrelated transplants was more than related ones in Japan (2,551 vs. 1,202) and Australia (329 vs. 291), whereas more than 80% of all transplants were related transplants in Malaysia (90.9%), India (89.5%), Iran (87.2%), Vietnam (85.7%), China (80.9%), and Thailand (80.6%). All transplant activities were related transplants in Pakistan, the Philippines, Myanmar, and Nepal, and no allogeneic transplants were performed in Bangladesh and Mongolia. Regarding the indications for transplants, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was the most common disease for allogeneic transplant (4,759, 35.1% of allogeneic transplants), while plasma cell disorder (PCD) was the most common disease for autologous transplant (3,701, 27.3% of all autologous transplants). Furthermore, the number of transplants for hemoglobinopathy has steeply increased in this region compared with the rest of disease indications (677, 3.1% of all transplants). APBMT covers a broad area globally, including countries/regions with diverse disease distribution, development of HSCT programs, population, and economic power. Consistent and continuous activity surveys considering those elements in each country/region revealed the HSCT field's diverse characteristics and background factors in this region.

Docetaxel-induced interstitial lung disease among patients with breast cancer: a case series and review of literature.

Taxane-induced pneumotoxicity is rare. However, 1-5% of patients taking docetaxel may develop severe pneumotoxicity. This has been limited to case reports in the literature. We report seven breast cancer patients who developed docetaxel-induced diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) of an organizing pneumonia pattern on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). The patients presented with progressive breathlessness within four weeks of the final dose. All had an organizing pneumonia pattern on their HRCTs, without other evidence of infection. Restrictive lung disease with low carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) was noted, with desaturation on a 6-min walk test (6MWT). They were started on prednisolone. Repeated HRCT after four to eight weeks from the commencement of steroid treatment showed marked improvement. The clinical and functional improvement were also significant. One patient succumbed to the illness as a result of severe lung involvement. Docetaxel-induced DPLD is a fatal adverse effect, which can be managed by the cessation of the drug and starting on steroids in adequate doses.

Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma: updated results of a phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity and efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) for localized carcinoma of the prostate, using a hypofractionated (55 Gy/20 fractions/4 weeks) vs. a conventionally fractionated (64 Gy/32 fractions/6.5 weeks) dose schedule. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 217 patients were randomized to either the hypofractionated (108 patients) or the conventional (109 patients) dose schedule, with planning with two-dimensional (2D) CT scan planning methodology in the majority of cases. All patients were followed for a median of 48 (6-108) months. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was evaluated before RT and after its completion using modified late effects of normal tissue-subjective, objective, management, analytic (LENT-SOMA) scales and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer sexual function questionnaire. Efficacy of RT based on clinical, radiologic, and prostate-specific antigen data were also evaluated at baseline and after RT. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal and GU toxicity persisted 5 years after RT and did not differ between the two dose schedules other than in regard to urgency of defecation. However, 1-month GI toxicity was not only worse in patients with the hypofractionated RT schedule but also adversely affected daily activities. Nadir prostate-specific antigen values occurred at a median of 18.0 (3.0-54.0) months after RT. A total of 76 biochemical relapses, with or without clinical relapses, have occurred since; of these, 37 were in the hypofractionated and 39 in the conventional schedule. The 5-year biochemical +/- clinical relapse-free and overall survival was 55.9% and 85.3% respectively for all patients, and did not differ between the two schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma causes persistent GI toxicity that is largely independent of the two dose schedules. The hypofractionated schedule is equivalent in efficacy to the conventional schedule.